Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

February 25 2015

0756 57f8
Reposted fromnyaako nyaako viagruetze gruetze

February 21 2015

7831 1a17
Reposted frommmateusz mmateusz viawillid willid

February 18 2015

Reposted fromcats cats viagruetze gruetze
2729 40bd 500
Reposted fromblackcandy blackcandy viaedenpath edenpath

February 10 2015

Reposted fromfungi fungi viaPsychoTheRapist PsychoTheRapist

February 07 2015

4684 6943 500



this is a dragon

but only a baby

Reposted fromthorinobsessed thorinobsessed viajchigo jchigo
7109 b97d 500
Reposted byoperativechaosdorf

February 05 2015

6034 fe3c
Reposted from1911 1911 viaLukasYork LukasYork

February 04 2015

CERN Basement.
Reposted fromvolldost volldost viasputnik27 sputnik27

February 02 2015


So a bunch of people noted in yesterday's Ebonics thread that conversate wasn't a word, because it wasn't in the Oxford English Dictionary. Well, I had nothing better to do today, so I decided to call up the OED people and see if I could get an editor to talk to me. Jesse Sheidlower, Editor At Large for the Oxford English Dictionary, was nice enough to bring some knowledge to this most important subject.

Ta-Nehisi: So is conversate a word?

Jesse Sheidlower:
Of course it's a word, the question is, is it acceptable. There are a lot of things that are acceptable in some situations, and not acceptable in others. "Table" is generally acceptable, but "ass" or "fuck" might not be, In some cases they would. It's the same for "hopefully" or "irregardless." They're all words, but it behooves us to be serious and ask, is it acceptable in this context? If you're delivering the State of the Union address, maybe "fuck" is not acceptable. If you're having sex with your girlfriend, maybe it is acceptable.

If a word isn't in the OED, does that mean it isn't actually a word?

JS: No, not all. No dictionary can include all words. The OED  can only cover a small fraction of all the words out there. There's nothing official about the OED or any other dictionary out there. People sometimes think that it is, or pretend that it is. I think it's the most comprehensive and the best researched. But there are zillions of words that are not in the OED.

Our goal is to include things that are in widespread use. We don't care about things like whether they are acceptable, ungrammatical, or offensive. There are times when we have many, many words for the same concept. People say, "We don't need conversate, we have converse." Well then,  we don't need hip because we have cool. We don't need illness because we have malady.

There are factors that we look at. They include how widespread something really is. How long has it been around? How broad is its use? A word that's in widespread use in many places is more likely to be included than a word that is only used in a small place but is widespread.


TNC: What fuels the notion that certain words aren't really words?

JS: There a lot of different things. People feel that there is a certain kind of language that's appropriate and a certain type that isn't appropriate. And these judgments are based on many things--some may make sense, some might not. People take these things very seriously. People are told things about the language in school that are demonstrably untrue, and they think anyone who doesn't follow along with those beliefs is stupid or wrong.

Let me give you an example, in terms of looking at things historically. At the beginning of this conversation you pronounced the word "ask" as "aks." This is something that people often object to. People say it's the wrong pronunciation, and it's stupid. But if you look at the history of the English language, you can't tell if the correct pronunciation is "aks" or "ask." The "aks" pronunciation goes back 1000 years. It's in Beowulf. It's in Chaucer.

What happened was both were in use. But at some point, the dialect in which the "ask" pronunciation was used became dominant. But both continued and have been in use since then. When you look at America, the "aks" pronunciation is widespread in Southern American English. African-Americans used this because they were in the South--it's not especially African-American, but its Southern.

Now, if you look at other Germanic languages, the "correct" pronunciation is, in fact, "ask"--but you can't tell that looking just at English and it ultimately doesn't matter. If I asked you to name the ordinal number between "second" and "fourth" you'd say, what?

TNC: Third.

JS: Right, third--but the old pronunciation is "thred," it comes from three. But if you were to say thred, you'd be considered a moron--even though it's "correct."

TNC: Will conversate be included after the next revision of the OED?

JS: It's very likely to go in.

Added Bonus: Irregardless of what you think, "conversate" is a word - The Atlantic
Reposted fromlordminx lordminx viatobold tobold

January 31 2015

9311 2a8b
Reposted fromnyaako nyaako viateisei teisei
Reposted fromscience science viarepostedfrom repostedfrom

January 27 2015

1611 a6ef
Reposted fromproof proof viacats cats

January 26 2015

7512 2a92 500
Reposted fromHumorMeSilly HumorMeSilly viagrufty grufty

January 18 2015

1685 3936 500








Circus Tree: Six individual sycamore trees were shaped, bent, and braided to form this.

how the hell do you bend and braid a tree

Actually pretty easy. Trees don’t reject tissue from other trees in the same family. You bend the tree to another tree when it is a sapling, scrape off the bark on both trees where they touch, add some damp sphagnum moss around them to keep everything slightly moist and bind them together. 
Then wait a few years- The trees will have grown together. 

You can use a similar technique to graft a lemon branch or a lime branch or even both- onto an orange tree and have one tree that has all three fruits.


As a biologist I can clearly state that plants are fucking weird and you should probably be slightly afraid of them.

On that note! At the university (UBC) located in town, the Agriculture students were told by their teacher that a tree flipped upside down would die. So they took an excavator and flipped the tree upside down. And it’s still growing. But the branches are now the roots, and the roots are now these super gnarly looking branches. Be afraid.

But Vi, how can you mention that and NOT post a picture? D:



I am both amazed and horrified of nature as we all should be

January 16 2015

4786 13f1
Reposted fromjestemtutaj jestemtutaj viascorpix scorpix

January 14 2015

1919 5886 500
Reposted fromAdasyd Adasyd viamatuss matuss
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!